Interaction Design Studio (DECO1200)
July 2007: Project Marks

Project Marks

The following table provides a quick guide to your marks so far this semester. The brief comments relate to your major deliverables, i.e., minisites 1 & 2. For more information about the breakdown of marks and the assessment see below.

Legend

  • P1: Presentation 1 (5%)
  • M1: Minisite 1 (20%)
  • M2: Minisite 2 (20%)
  • P2: Presentation 2 (5%)

Individual Project Marks Sorted by Student ID

Student ID P1 M1 M2 P2 Comments

200116683

100%

98%

92%

---

Great idea. Excellent documentation.

Some danger of original idea being diluted as features creep in.

306133962

100%

58%

62%

---

Good research of users and requirements

No process documentation (blog). Ironic web design?

306134608

40%

81%

79%

---

Very good use of scenarios to describe the idea.

Application idea is a bit too broad, try to focus it.

306141418

60%

---

---

---

306151405

80%

65%

59%

---

Good use of design template, nice writing style.

Documentation is far too brief in all areas.

306209055

80%

88%

62%

---

Good initial idea.

Sadly, development of idea between minisites is unfocussed.

306210649

100%

99%

91%

---

Interesting idea. Good first minisite. Well documented.

Process documentation (blog) stopped, which is a shame...

307139530

80%

79%

81%

---

Strong concept. Well designed web site. Clear documentation.

More research into similar ideas could have provided inspiration.

307140059

80%

92%

98%

---

Good research to support far-fetched concept.

Confused ideas about potential user group. More research needed?

307140857

60%

75%

85%

---

Useful application ideas, appropriate to iPhone.

Strange initial choice of potential user group.

307141594

60%

72%

65%

---

Good documentation of process and initial idea.

Development of idea reasonable but could be pushed much further.

307146413

80%

71%

69%

---

Recommender system is a good idea for the iPhone.

Minisites need more written content. Multimedia platform specific.

307153665

80%

75%

65%

---

Good idea. Well documented of idea and process.

Is the aesthetic of your 2nd mini site appropriate?

307156087

100%

58%

52%

---

Good idea, good documentation of data gathering.

Documentation of original idea lacking. Web site was broken.

307164454

60%

78%

72%

---

Excellent use of multimedia to document idea.

More background research should be in documentation.

307165760

80%

79%

81%

---

Excellent initial idea for application.

Some problems with design/layout of web site detract from content.

307165787

100%

78%

82%

---

Great application idea. Good mini site design.

Initial analysis of user requirements a little confused.

307165922

60%

69%

71%

---

Basic concept is very strong. Some good web design.

Lack of analysis of research. Interface far too crowded.

307166775

60%

61%

59%

---

A good application idea.

Concept should have been developed much further.

307167992

60%

63%

67%

---

Attractive minisites. Interesting concept.

Application interface should be tailored more towards iPhone.

307169006

80%

83%

87%

---

Great concept for a location based game.

Some presentation issues with original web site.

307171760

80%

79%

71%

---

Great game ideas that really work with iPhone.

Need better description of how feedback has affected redesign.

307177602

80%

68%

72%

---

Far-fetched concept. :-) Nice ideas for initial minisite.

Background research should have been better documented.

307185478

40%

69%

69%

---

Good research to back up design process.

Documentation of ideas a little sparse, more info/thought needed.

307187004

80%

97%

98%

---

Very good development and presentation of ideas.

307189317

100%

91%

99%

---

Ambitious idea. Excellent documentation.

307191303

100%

77%

73%

---

Very good web design. Idea fits well with iPhone.

Design of application needs more work.

307195392

60%

79%

61%

---

Consistent design, well-matched to concept.

More research needed to develop ideas further.

307198235

60%

78%

82%

---

Nice idea. Good analysis of feedback from users.

Some more research about similar devices would be good.

307199258

60%

78%

62%

---

Challenging idea, requiring research of user group.

More documentation of process and analysis of user feedback needed.

307200388

60%

71%

69%

---

Use of Flash OK but small window is problematic.

No process documentation (blog)!

307203158

80%

79%

81%

---

Good documentation of initial idea & analysis of feedback.

Documentation of process has slooowed down... shame.

307204006

60%

89%

91%

---

Very well documented. Excellent design process.

307204367

100%

82%

78%

---

Provocative game idea. Good user requirements gathering.

Wed sites and hi-fi prototype should reflect aesthetics of game.

307207536

60%

75%

55%

---

Great game idea for iPhone.

Very little development evident between minisites.

307216764

60%

78%

72%

---

Great minisites. Good user feedback analysis.

Shame the blogging of the process stopped.

307216926

80%

---

---

---

307220575

80%

77%

73%

---

Good work getting feedback from potential users.

Process documentation (blog) ended back in August.

Assessment

Milestones / Deliverables

The following table provides a breakdown of the grading system according to the various deliverables that must be completed during the semester.

  Value Comment

Presentation 1

5%

Presentation of initial idea for iPhone application.

Minisite 1

20%

Web site documenting initial design idea, prototype and feedback from users.

Minisite 2

20%

Web site documenting revised design and results from prototyping it with potential users.

Presentation 2

5%

Presentation of on-going design process to be given in the second half of the semester.

Final Website

50%

Web site presenting final design idea as a completed product.

Grading System

The following table provides a breakdown of grading system according to the activities required for each deliverable. Each deliverable should show some evidence of each of the following, although they are assessed differently between minisites and presentations.

  Value Comment

Research

20%

Research the problem, research the technology, research other Web 2.0 applications for the iPhone.

Design

20%

Design of the look and feel of your application and your website is a major factor in your assessment.

Process

20%

Document your design process and your reflections on your blog. This will include blogging about class.

Documentation

40%

Document your design on your product website(s). This will include the use of video and audio.