Project Marks
The following table provides a quick guide to your marks so far this semester. The brief comments relate to your major deliverables, i.e., minisites 1 & 2. For more information about the breakdown of marks and the assessment see below.
Legend
- P1: Presentation 1 (5%)
- M1: Minisite 1 (20%)
- M2: Minisite 2 (20%)
- P2: Presentation 2 (5%)
Individual Project Marks Sorted by Student ID
| Student ID | P1 | M1 | M2 | P2 | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
200116683 |
100% |
98% |
92% |
--- |
Great idea. Excellent documentation. |
Some danger of original idea being diluted as features creep in. |
306133962 |
100% |
58% |
62% |
--- |
Good research of users and requirements |
No process documentation (blog). Ironic web design? |
306134608 |
40% |
81% |
79% |
--- |
Very good use of scenarios to describe the idea. |
Application idea is a bit too broad, try to focus it. |
306141418 |
60% |
--- |
--- |
--- |
||
306151405 |
80% |
65% |
59% |
--- |
Good use of design template, nice writing style. |
Documentation is far too brief in all areas. |
306209055 |
80% |
88% |
62% |
--- |
Good initial idea. |
Sadly, development of idea between minisites is unfocussed. |
306210649 |
100% |
99% |
91% |
--- |
Interesting idea. Good first minisite. Well documented. |
Process documentation (blog) stopped, which is a shame... |
307139530 |
80% |
79% |
81% |
--- |
Strong concept. Well designed web site. Clear documentation. |
More research into similar ideas could have provided inspiration. |
307140059 |
80% |
92% |
98% |
--- |
Good research to support far-fetched concept. |
Confused ideas about potential user group. More research needed? |
307140857 |
60% |
75% |
85% |
--- |
Useful application ideas, appropriate to iPhone. |
Strange initial choice of potential user group. |
307141594 |
60% |
72% |
65% |
--- |
Good documentation of process and initial idea. |
Development of idea reasonable but could be pushed much further. |
307146413 |
80% |
71% |
69% |
--- |
Recommender system is a good idea for the iPhone. |
Minisites need more written content. Multimedia platform specific. |
307153665 |
80% |
75% |
65% |
--- |
Good idea. Well documented of idea and process. |
Is the aesthetic of your 2nd mini site appropriate? |
307156087 |
100% |
58% |
52% |
--- |
Good idea, good documentation of data gathering. |
Documentation of original idea lacking. Web site was broken. |
307164454 |
60% |
78% |
72% |
--- |
Excellent use of multimedia to document idea. |
More background research should be in documentation. |
307165760 |
80% |
79% |
81% |
--- |
Excellent initial idea for application. |
Some problems with design/layout of web site detract from content. |
307165787 |
100% |
78% |
82% |
--- |
Great application idea. Good mini site design. |
Initial analysis of user requirements a little confused. |
307165922 |
60% |
69% |
71% |
--- |
Basic concept is very strong. Some good web design. |
Lack of analysis of research. Interface far too crowded. |
307166775 |
60% |
61% |
59% |
--- |
A good application idea. |
Concept should have been developed much further. |
307167992 |
60% |
63% |
67% |
--- |
Attractive minisites. Interesting concept. |
Application interface should be tailored more towards iPhone. |
307169006 |
80% |
83% |
87% |
--- |
Great concept for a location based game. |
Some presentation issues with original web site. |
307171760 |
80% |
79% |
71% |
--- |
Great game ideas that really work with iPhone. |
Need better description of how feedback has affected redesign. |
307177602 |
80% |
68% |
72% |
--- |
Far-fetched concept. :-) Nice ideas for initial minisite. |
Background research should have been better documented. |
307185478 |
40% |
69% |
69% |
--- |
Good research to back up design process. |
Documentation of ideas a little sparse, more info/thought needed. |
307187004 |
80% |
97% |
98% |
--- |
Very good development and presentation of ideas. |
|
307189317 |
100% |
91% |
99% |
--- |
Ambitious idea. Excellent documentation. |
|
307191303 |
100% |
77% |
73% |
--- |
Very good web design. Idea fits well with iPhone. |
Design of application needs more work. |
307195392 |
60% |
79% |
61% |
--- |
Consistent design, well-matched to concept. |
More research needed to develop ideas further. |
307198235 |
60% |
78% |
82% |
--- |
Nice idea. Good analysis of feedback from users. |
Some more research about similar devices would be good. |
307199258 |
60% |
78% |
62% |
--- |
Challenging idea, requiring research of user group. |
More documentation of process and analysis of user feedback needed. |
307200388 |
60% |
71% |
69% |
--- |
Use of Flash OK but small window is problematic. |
No process documentation (blog)! |
307203158 |
80% |
79% |
81% |
--- |
Good documentation of initial idea & analysis of feedback. |
Documentation of process has slooowed down... shame. |
307204006 |
60% |
89% |
91% |
--- |
Very well documented. Excellent design process. |
|
307204367 |
100% |
82% |
78% |
--- |
Provocative game idea. Good user requirements gathering. |
Wed sites and hi-fi prototype should reflect aesthetics of game. |
307207536 |
60% |
75% |
55% |
--- |
Great game idea for iPhone. |
Very little development evident between minisites. |
307216764 |
60% |
78% |
72% |
--- |
Great minisites. Good user feedback analysis. |
Shame the blogging of the process stopped. |
307216926 |
80% |
--- |
--- |
--- |
||
307220575 |
80% |
77% |
73% |
--- |
Good work getting feedback from potential users. |
Process documentation (blog) ended back in August. |
Assessment
Milestones / Deliverables
The following table provides a breakdown of the grading system according to the various deliverables that must be completed during the semester.
| Value | Comment | |
|---|---|---|
Presentation 1 |
5% |
Presentation of initial idea for iPhone application. |
Minisite 1 |
20% |
Web site documenting initial design idea, prototype and feedback from users. |
Minisite 2 |
20% |
Web site documenting revised design and results from prototyping it with potential users. |
Presentation 2 |
5% |
Presentation of on-going design process to be given in the second half of the semester. |
Final Website |
50% |
Web site presenting final design idea as a completed product. |
Grading System
The following table provides a breakdown of grading system according to the activities required for each deliverable. Each deliverable should show some evidence of each of the following, although they are assessed differently between minisites and presentations.
| Value | Comment | |
|---|---|---|
Research |
20% |
Research the problem, research the technology, research other Web 2.0 applications for the iPhone. |
Design |
20% |
Design of the look and feel of your application and your website is a major factor in your assessment. |
Process |
20% |
Document your design process and your reflections on your blog. This will include blogging about class. |
Documentation |
40% |
Document your design on your product website(s). This will include the use of video and audio. |